[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 7/9] x86/pv: Merge the pv hypercall tables
For the same reason as c/s 33a231e3f "x86/HVM: fold hypercall tables", this removes the risk of accidentally updating only one of the tables. Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> --- xen/arch/x86/hypercall.c | 75 +++++++++--------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hypercall.c b/xen/arch/x86/hypercall.c index b814c0b..4a96f23 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/hypercall.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hypercall.c @@ -114,64 +114,15 @@ const uint8_t compat_hypercall_args_table[NR_hypercalls] = #undef ARGS #define HYPERCALL(x) \ - [ __HYPERVISOR_ ## x ] = (hypercall_fn_t *) do_ ## x + [ __HYPERVISOR_ ## x ] = { (hypercall_fn_t *) do_ ## x, \ + (hypercall_fn_t *) do_ ## x } +#define COMPAT_CALL(x) \ + [ __HYPERVISOR_ ## x ] = { (hypercall_fn_t *) do_ ## x, \ + (hypercall_fn_t *) compat_ ## x } #define do_arch_1 paging_domctl_continuation -hypercall_fn_t *const hypercall_table[NR_hypercalls] = { - HYPERCALL(set_trap_table), - HYPERCALL(mmu_update), - HYPERCALL(set_gdt), - HYPERCALL(stack_switch), - HYPERCALL(set_callbacks), - HYPERCALL(fpu_taskswitch), - HYPERCALL(sched_op_compat), - HYPERCALL(platform_op), - HYPERCALL(set_debugreg), - HYPERCALL(get_debugreg), - HYPERCALL(update_descriptor), - HYPERCALL(memory_op), - HYPERCALL(multicall), - HYPERCALL(update_va_mapping), - HYPERCALL(set_timer_op), - HYPERCALL(event_channel_op_compat), - HYPERCALL(xen_version), - HYPERCALL(console_io), - HYPERCALL(physdev_op_compat), - HYPERCALL(grant_table_op), - HYPERCALL(vm_assist), - HYPERCALL(update_va_mapping_otherdomain), - HYPERCALL(iret), - HYPERCALL(vcpu_op), - HYPERCALL(set_segment_base), - HYPERCALL(mmuext_op), - HYPERCALL(xsm_op), - HYPERCALL(nmi_op), - HYPERCALL(sched_op), - HYPERCALL(callback_op), -#ifdef CONFIG_XENOPROF - HYPERCALL(xenoprof_op), -#endif - HYPERCALL(event_channel_op), - HYPERCALL(physdev_op), - HYPERCALL(hvm_op), - HYPERCALL(sysctl), - HYPERCALL(domctl), -#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC - HYPERCALL(kexec_op), -#endif -#ifdef CONFIG_TMEM - HYPERCALL(tmem_op), -#endif - HYPERCALL(xenpmu_op), - HYPERCALL(mca), - HYPERCALL(arch_1), -}; - -#define COMPAT_CALL(x) \ - [ __HYPERVISOR_ ## x ] = (hypercall_fn_t *) compat_ ## x - -hypercall_fn_t *const compat_hypercall_table[NR_hypercalls] = { +static const hypercall_table_t pv_hypercall_table[NR_hypercalls] = { COMPAT_CALL(set_trap_table), HYPERCALL(mmu_update), COMPAT_CALL(set_gdt), @@ -237,7 +188,7 @@ void pv_hypercall(struct cpu_user_regs *regs) eax = is_pv_32bit_vcpu(curr) ? regs->_eax : regs->eax; - if ( (eax >= NR_hypercalls) || !hypercall_table[eax] ) + if ( (eax >= NR_hypercalls) || !pv_hypercall_table[eax].native ) { regs->eax = -ENOSYS; return; @@ -271,7 +222,7 @@ void pv_hypercall(struct cpu_user_regs *regs) __trace_hypercall(TRC_PV_HYPERCALL_V2, eax, args); } - regs->eax = hypercall_table[eax](rdi, rsi, rdx, r10, r8, r9); + regs->eax = pv_hypercall_table[eax].native(rdi, rsi, rdx, r10, r8, r9); #ifndef NDEBUG if ( regs->rip == old_rip ) @@ -318,7 +269,7 @@ void pv_hypercall(struct cpu_user_regs *regs) __trace_hypercall(TRC_PV_HYPERCALL_V2, eax, args); } - regs->_eax = compat_hypercall_table[eax](ebx, ecx, edx, esi, edi, ebp); + regs->_eax = pv_hypercall_table[eax].compat(ebx, ecx, edx, esi, edi, ebp); #ifndef NDEBUG if ( regs->rip == old_rip ) @@ -346,8 +297,8 @@ void arch_do_multicall_call(struct mc_state *state) { struct multicall_entry *call = &state->call; - if ( (call->op < NR_hypercalls) && hypercall_table[call->op] ) - call->result = hypercall_table[call->op]( + if ( (call->op < NR_hypercalls) && pv_hypercall_table[call->op].native ) + call->result = pv_hypercall_table[call->op].native( call->args[0], call->args[1], call->args[2], call->args[3], call->args[4], call->args[5]); else @@ -358,8 +309,8 @@ void arch_do_multicall_call(struct mc_state *state) { struct compat_multicall_entry *call = &state->compat_call; - if ( (call->op < NR_hypercalls) && compat_hypercall_table[call->op] ) - call->result = compat_hypercall_table[call->op]( + if ( (call->op < NR_hypercalls) && pv_hypercall_table[call->op].compat ) + call->result = pv_hypercall_table[call->op].compat( call->args[0], call->args[1], call->args[2], call->args[3], call->args[4], call->args[5]); else -- 2.1.4 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |