[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 4/9] version: Print build-id at bootup.
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 02:58:48AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 24.08.16 at 04:22, <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Livepatch expected at some point to be able to print the > > build-id during bootup, which it did not. The reason is > > that xen_build_init and livepatch_init are both __initcall > > type routines. This meant that when livepatch_init called > > xen_build_id, it would return -ENODATA as build_id_len was > > not setup yet (b/c xen_build_init would be called later). > > > > The original patch fixed this by calling xen_build_init in > > livepatch_init which allows us to print the build-id of > > the hypervisor. > > > > However the x86 maintainers pointed out that build-id > > is independent of Livepatch and in fact should print > > regardless whether Livepatch is enabled or not. > > > > Therefore this patch moves the logic of printing the build-id > > to version.c. > > > > Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> Thank you. I had a slight change due to rebasing on "x86/EFI: use less crude a way of generating the build" which was quite simple to fix so I retained your Reviewed-by tag. The final patch looks as so: From 927c9accac9a49b586f616060e5567d7b03e3e77 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 12:18:10 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] version: Print build-id at bootup. Livepatch expected at some point to be able to print the build-id during bootup, which it did not. The reason is that xen_build_init and livepatch_init are both __initcall type routines. This meant that when livepatch_init called xen_build_id, it would return -ENODATA as build_id_len was not setup yet (b/c xen_build_init would be called later). The original patch fixed this by calling xen_build_init in livepatch_init which allows us to print the build-id of the hypervisor. However the x86 maintainers pointed out that build-id is independent of Livepatch and in fact should print regardless whether Livepatch is enabled or not. Therefore this patch moves the logic of printing the build-id to version.c. Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Cc: Ross Lagerwall <ross.lagerwall@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> v2: Move xen_build_init in version.h instead of livepatch.h v3: Posted as "livepatch: Sync cache of build-id before using it first time" v4: Move the printing of build-id to version.c. Change title v5: Rebased on top "x86/EFI: use less crude a way of generating the build ID" Added Jan's Ack. --- xen/common/livepatch.c | 6 ------ xen/common/version.c | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/common/livepatch.c b/xen/common/livepatch.c index 78b3731..4c3056c 100644 --- a/xen/common/livepatch.c +++ b/xen/common/livepatch.c @@ -1580,12 +1580,6 @@ static void livepatch_printall(unsigned char key) static int __init livepatch_init(void) { - const void *binary_id; - unsigned int len; - - if ( !xen_build_id(&binary_id, &len) ) - printk(XENLOG_INFO LIVEPATCH ": build-id: %*phN\n", len, binary_id); - register_keyhandler('x', livepatch_printall, "print livepatch info", 1); arch_livepatch_init(); diff --git a/xen/common/version.c b/xen/common/version.c index 4375ea2..0d31e38 100644 --- a/xen/common/version.c +++ b/xen/common/version.c @@ -186,6 +186,8 @@ static int __init xen_build_init(void) } } #endif + if ( !rc ) + printk(XENLOG_INFO "build-id: %*phN\n", build_id_len, build_id_p); return rc; } -- 2.4.11 > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |