Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH linux v3 3/9] xen: introduce xen_vcpu_id mapping

[Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 6 Sep 2016, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > On Mon, 5 Sep 2016, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> >> Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx> writes:
> >> 
> >> > Hi Vitaly,
> >> >
> >> > On 26/07/16 13:30, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> >> >> It may happen that Xen's and Linux's ideas of vCPU id diverge. In
> >> >> particular, when we crash on a secondary vCPU we may want to do kdump
> >> >> and unlike plain kexec where we do migrate_to_reboot_cpu() we try 
> >> >> booting
> >> >> on the vCPU which crashed. This doesn't work very well for PVHVM guests 
> >> >> as
> >> >> we have a number of hypercalls where we pass vCPU id as a parameter. 
> >> >> These
> >> >> hypercalls either fail or do something unexpected. To solve the issue
> >> >> introduce percpu xen_vcpu_id mapping. ARM and PV guests get direct 
> >> >> mapping
> >> >> for now. Boot CPU for PVHVM guest gets its id from CPUID. With secondary
> >> >> CPUs it is a bit more trickier. Currently, we initialize IPI vectors
> >> >> before these CPUs boot so we can't use CPUID. Use ACPI ids from MADT
> >> >> instead.
> >> >>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >> ---
> >> >> Changes since v2:
> >> >> - Use uint32_t for xen_vcpu_id mapping [Julien Grall]
> >> >>
> >> >> Changes since v1:
> >> >> - Introduce xen_vcpu_nr() helper [David Vrabel]
> >> >> - Use ACPI ids instead of vLAPIC ids /2 [Andrew Cooper, Jan Beulich]
> >> >> ---
> >> >>  arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c | 10 ++++++++++
> >> >>  arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >> >>  include/xen/xen-ops.h    |  6 ++++++
> >> >>  3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> >>
> >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> >> >> index 75cd734..fe32267 100644
> >> >> --- a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> >> >> +++ b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> >> >> @@ -46,6 +46,10 @@ struct shared_info *HYPERVISOR_shared_info = (void 
> >> >> *)&xen_dummy_shared_info;
> >> >>  DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct vcpu_info *, xen_vcpu);
> >> >>  static struct vcpu_info __percpu *xen_vcpu_info;
> >> >>
> >> >> +/* Linux <-> Xen vCPU id mapping */
> >> >> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(uint32_t, xen_vcpu_id) = U32_MAX;
> >> >> +EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(xen_vcpu_id);
> >> >> +
> >> >>  /* These are unused until we support booting "pre-ballooned" */
> >> >>  unsigned long xen_released_pages;
> >> >>  struct xen_memory_region xen_extra_mem[XEN_EXTRA_MEM_MAX_REGIONS] 
> >> >> __initdata;
> >> >> @@ -179,6 +183,9 @@ static void xen_percpu_init(void)
> >> >>         pr_info("Xen: initializing cpu%d\n", cpu);
> >> >>         vcpup = per_cpu_ptr(xen_vcpu_info, cpu);
> >> >>
> >> >> +       /* Direct vCPU id mapping for ARM guests. */
> >> >> +       per_cpu(xen_vcpu_id, cpu) = cpu;
> >> >> +
> >> >
> >> > We did some internal testing on ARM64 with the latest Linux kernel
> >> > (4.8-rc4) and noticed that this patch is breaking SMP support. Sorry
> >> > for noticing the issue that late.
> >> 
> >> Sorry for the breakage :-(
> >> 
> >> >
> >> > This function is called on the running CPU whilst some code (e.g
> >> > init_control_block in drivers/xen/events/events_fifo.c) is executed
> >> > whilst preparing the CPU on the boot CPU.
> >> >
> >> > So xen_vcpu_nr(cpu) will always return 0 in this case and
> >> > init_control_block will fail to execute.
> >> >
> >> 
> >> I see,
> >> 
> >> CPU_UP_PREPARE event happens before xen_starting_cpu() is called.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> > I am not sure how to fix. I guess we could setup per_cpu(xen_vcpu_id,
> >> > *) in xen_guest_init. Any opinions?
> >> 
> >> As we're not doing kexec on ARM we can fix the immediate issue. I don't
> >> know much about ARM and unfortunatelly I don't have a setup to test but
> >> it seems there is no early_per_cpu* infrastructure for ARM so we may fix
> >> it with the following:
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> >> index 3d2cef6..f193414 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> >> @@ -170,9 +170,6 @@ static int xen_starting_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
> >>         pr_info("Xen: initializing cpu%d\n", cpu);
> >>         vcpup = per_cpu_ptr(xen_vcpu_info, cpu);
> >>  
> >> -       /* Direct vCPU id mapping for ARM guests. */
> >> -       per_cpu(xen_vcpu_id, cpu) = cpu;
> >> -
> >>         info.mfn = virt_to_gfn(vcpup);
> >>         info.offset = xen_offset_in_page(vcpup);
> >>  
> >> @@ -330,6 +327,7 @@ static int __init xen_guest_init(void)
> >>  {
> >>         struct xen_add_to_physmap xatp;
> >>         struct shared_info *shared_info_page = NULL;
> >> +       int cpu;
> >>  
> >>         if (!xen_domain())
> >>                 return 0;
> >> @@ -380,7 +378,8 @@ static int __init xen_guest_init(void)
> >>                 return -ENOMEM;
> >>  
> >>         /* Direct vCPU id mapping for ARM guests. */
> >> -       per_cpu(xen_vcpu_id, 0) = 0;
> >> +       for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> >> +               per_cpu(xen_vcpu_id, cpu) = cpu;
> >>  
> >>         xen_auto_xlat_grant_frames.count = gnttab_max_grant_frames();
> >>         if (xen_xlate_map_ballooned_pages(&xen_auto_xlat_grant_frames.pfn,
> >> 
> >> (not tested, if we can't use for_each_possible_cpu() that early we'll
> >> have to check against NR_CPUS instead).
> >
> > Kind of defeat the purpose of xen_vcpu_id, but I guess it should work.
> >
> >> But unfortunatelly we'll have to get back to this in future. Turns out
> >> we need to know Xen's idea of vCPU id _before_ this vCPU starts
> >> executing code.
> >
> > Why?
> 
> E.g. for FIFO event channels we currently call
> evtchn_fifo_cpu_notification() for CPU_UP_PREPARE event (and do a
> hypercall which requires us to know vcpu id) and this happens before the
> secodary cpu starts. I'm not sure this can't be changed in future.
> 
> >
> >> On x86 we used ACPI_ID from MADT. Is there anything like
> >> it on ARM?
> >
> > MPIDR: 
> >
> > http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.ddi0388e/CIHEBGFG.html
> >
> 
> Thanks, but doesn't it work the same way CPUID instruction works? In
> that case we won't be able to use it to figure out other CPU's id.

I don't know that much about cpuid, but the virtual MPIDR is constructed
from the vcpu id right now:

    v->arch.vmpidr = MPIDR_SMP | vcpuid_to_vaffinity(v->vcpu_id);
    
    [...]

    static inline register_t vcpuid_to_vaffinity(unsigned int vcpuid)
    {
        register_t vaff;
    
        vaff = (vcpuid & 0x0f) << MPIDR_LEVEL_SHIFT(0);
        vaff |= ((vcpuid >> 4) & MPIDR_LEVEL_MASK) << MPIDR_LEVEL_SHIFT(1);
    
        return vaff;
    }

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel