[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] xen/pciback: support driver_override



On 09/02/2016 08:30 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Support the driver_override scheme introduced with commit 782a985d7af2
> ("PCI: Introduce new device binding path using pci_dev.driver_override")
>
> As pcistub_probe() is called for all devices (it has to check for a
> match based on the slot address rather than device type) it has to
> check for driver_override set to "pciback" itself.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> V2: removed now unused label
> ---
>  drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c | 16 ++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c 
> b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c
> index 258b7c3..85c28f7 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@
>  #include "conf_space.h"
>  #include "conf_space_quirks.h"
>  
> +#define PCISTUB_DRIVER_NAME "pciback"
> +
>  static char *pci_devs_to_hide;
>  wait_queue_head_t xen_pcibk_aer_wait_queue;
>  /*Add sem for sync AER handling and xen_pcibk remove/reconfigue ops,
> @@ -529,16 +531,18 @@ static int pcistub_probe(struct pci_dev *dev, const 
> struct pci_device_id *id)
>                               "don't have a normal (0) or bridge (1) "
>                               "header type!\n");
>                       err = -ENODEV;
> -                     goto out;
>               }
>  
> +     } else if (!dev->driver_override ||
> +                strcmp(dev->driver_override, PCISTUB_DRIVER_NAME))
> +             /* Didn't find the device */
> +             err = -ENODEV;
> +
> +     if (!err) {
>               dev_info(&dev->dev, "seizing device\n");
>               err = pcistub_seize(dev);
> -     } else
> -             /* Didn't find the device */
> -             err = -ENODEV;
> +     }

Should devices with pciback override be displayed in
/sys/bus/pci/drivers/pciback/slots? If they should then they need to be
either added to pcistub_device_ids or kept on some other list.

Also, do you think checking override might better be done first, before
testing for ID match?

-boris


>  
> -out:
>       return err;
>  }
>  
> @@ -945,7 +949,7 @@ static const struct pci_error_handlers 
> xen_pcibk_error_handler = {
>  static struct pci_driver xen_pcibk_pci_driver = {
>       /* The name should be xen_pciback, but until the tools are updated
>        * we will keep it as pciback. */
> -     .name = "pciback",
> +     .name = PCISTUB_DRIVER_NAME,
>       .id_table = pcistub_ids,
>       .probe = pcistub_probe,
>       .remove = pcistub_remove,



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.