[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 05/15] efi: create efi_enabled()
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 04:27:11PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 05:58:46AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > > >>> On 12.09.16 at 22:18, <daniel.kiper@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > --- a/xen/arch/x86/domain_page.c > > > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain_page.c > > > @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ static inline struct vcpu *mapcache_current_vcpu(void) > > > * domain's page tables but current may point at another domain's > > > VCPU. > > > * Return NULL as though current is not properly set up yet. > > > */ > > > - if ( efi_enabled && efi_rs_using_pgtables() ) > > > + if ( efi_enabled(EFI_RS) && efi_rs_using_pgtables() ) > > > > I think the efi_enabled() here is pointless now. > > Nope, it seems that Xen will blow up on BUG() in > xen/arch/x86/efi/stub.c:efi_rs_using_pgtables() if > compiler/linker cannot be used to build proper PE binary. > Of course we can change efi_rs_using_pgtables() to > return false in such case. > > > With this dropped (unless you know of a reason that it needs to stay) > > Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> > > Thanks a lot! > > By the way, do you see this patch series (as whole or > at least partially) in 4.8? Should I repost them before > hard freeze? However, I am not sure that it (v7) can be > taken into 4.8 because we are after last posting date. > > Wei, Jan, what is your standing in that case? > If this series ready of course it can be applied from my PoV. The last posting date is more things that are entirely new, which is not applicable to this series (v7 already). (Note I haven't checked all patches in this series) Wei. > Daniel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |