[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC 0/5] xen/arm: support big.little SoC

On Thu, 22 Sep 2016, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 18:05 +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:50:23AM +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > > Yes (or I should say, "whatever", as I know nothing about all
> > > this! :-P)
> > 
> > One more thing I'd like to ask, do you prefer cpu classes to be ARM
> > specific or ARM/X86
> > common?
> > 
> I'm not sure. I'd say that it depends on where we are. I mean, in Xen,
> names can be rather specific, like some codename of the
> chip/core/family/etc.
> I'm not sure what this means for you, on ARM, but I guess it would
> depend on what you, Julien and Stefano will come up and agree on.

Actually it depends on what the x86 maintainers think. For us (ARM
maintainers) it makes little difference whether the concept of cpu
classes is ARM specific or common.

Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.