[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 17/30] xen/x86: setup PVHv2 Dom0 CPUs
>>> On 27.09.16 at 17:57, <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The logic used to setup the CPUID leaves is extremely simplistic (and > probably wrong for hardware different than mine). I'm not sure what's the > best way to deal with this, the code that currently sets the CPUID leaves > for HVM guests lives in libxc, maybe moving it xen/common would be better? Yeah, a pre-populated array of leaves certainly won't do. > + rc = arch_set_info_hvm_guest(v, &cpu_ctx); > + if ( rc ) > + { > + printk("Unable to setup Dom0 BSP context: %d\n", rc); > + return rc; > + } > + clear_bit(_VPF_down, &v->pause_flags); Even if it may not matter right away, I think you want to clear this flag later, after having completed all setup. > + for ( i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cpuid_leaves); i++ ) > + { > + d->arch.cpuids[i].input[0] = cpuid_leaves[i].index; > + d->arch.cpuids[i].input[1] = cpuid_leaves[i].count; > + if ( d->arch.cpuids[i].input[1] == XEN_CPUID_INPUT_UNUSED ) > + cpuid(d->arch.cpuids[i].input[0], &d->arch.cpuids[i].eax, > + &d->arch.cpuids[i].ebx, &d->arch.cpuids[i].ecx, > + &d->arch.cpuids[i].edx); > + else > + cpuid_count(d->arch.cpuids[i].input[0], > d->arch.cpuids[i].input[1], > + &d->arch.cpuids[i].eax, &d->arch.cpuids[i].ebx, > + &d->arch.cpuids[i].ecx, &d->arch.cpuids[i].edx); Why this if/else? It is always fine to use cpuid_count(). Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |