[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: replace redundant MTRR MSR definitions



We really should have only one set of #define-s for them.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>

--- a/xen/arch/x86/e820.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/e820.c
@@ -419,8 +419,6 @@ static void __init clip_to_limit(uint64_
 }
 
 /* Conservative estimate of top-of-RAM by looking for MTRR WB regions. */
-#define MSR_MTRRphysBase(reg) (0x200 + 2 * (reg))
-#define MSR_MTRRphysMask(reg) (0x200 + 2 * (reg) + 1)
 static uint64_t __init mtrr_top_of_ram(void)
 {
     uint32_t eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
@@ -477,8 +475,8 @@ static uint64_t __init mtrr_top_of_ram(v
     top = 0;
     for ( i = 0; i < (uint8_t)mtrr_cap; i++ )
     {
-        rdmsrl(MSR_MTRRphysBase(i), base);
-        rdmsrl(MSR_MTRRphysMask(i), mask);
+        rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MTRR_PHYSBASE(i), base);
+        rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MTRR_PHYSMASK(i), mask);
 
         if ( e820_verbose )
             printk(" MTRR[%d]: base %"PRIx64" mask %"PRIx64"\n",



Attachment: x86-e820-MTRR-names.patch
Description: Text document

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.