Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 0/5] implement vcpu preempted check

[Pan Xinhui <xinhui@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

在 2016/10/19 23:58, Juergen Gross 写道:
> On 19/10/16 12:20, Pan Xinhui wrote:
> > change from v3:
> >         add x86 vcpu preempted check patch
> > change from v2:
> >         no code change, fix typos, update some comments
> > change from v1:
> >         a simplier definition of default vcpu_is_preempted
> >         skip mahcine type check on ppc, and add config. remove dedicated macro.
> >         add one patch to drop overload of rwsem_spin_on_owner and 
> > mutex_spin_on_owner.
> >         add more comments
> >         thanks boqun and Peter's suggestion.
> >
> > This patch set aims to fix lock holder preemption issues.
> >
> > test-case:
> > perf record -a perf bench sched messaging -g 400 -p && perf report
> >
> > 18.09%  sched-messaging  [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] osq_lock
> > 12.28%  sched-messaging  [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] rwsem_spin_on_owner
> >  5.27%  sched-messaging  [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] mutex_unlock
> >  3.89%  sched-messaging  [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] wait_consider_task
> >  3.64%  sched-messaging  [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] _raw_write_lock_irq
> >  3.41%  sched-messaging  [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] mutex_spin_on_owner.is
> >  2.49%  sched-messaging  [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] system_call
> >
> > We introduce interface bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu) and use it in some spin
> > loops of osq_lock, rwsem_spin_on_owner and mutex_spin_on_owner.
> > These spin_on_onwer variant also cause rcu stall before we apply this patch set
> >
> > We also have observed some performace improvements.
> >
> > PPC test result:
> >
> > 1 copy - 0.94%
> > 2 copy - 7.17%
> > 4 copy - 11.9%
> > 8 copy -  3.04%
> > 16 copy - 15.11%
> >
> > details below:
> > Without patch:
> >
> > 1 copy - File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks      2188223.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 1 
> > samples)
> > 2 copy - File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks      1804433.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 1 
> > samples)
> > 4 copy - File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks      1237257.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 1 
> > samples)
> > 8 copy - File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks      1032658.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 1 
> > samples)
> > 16 copy - File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       768000.0 KBps  (30.1 s, 
> > 1 samples)
> >
> > With patch:
> >
> > 1 copy - File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks      2209189.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 1 
> > samples)
> > 2 copy - File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks      1943816.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 1 
> > samples)
> > 4 copy - File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks      1405591.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 1 
> > samples)
> > 8 copy - File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks      1065080.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 1 
> > samples)
> > 16 copy - File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       904762.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 
> > 1 samples)
> >
> > X86 test result:
> >         test-case                       after-patch       before-patch
> > Execl Throughput                       |    18307.9 lps  |    11701.6 lps
> > File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  |  1352407.3 KBps |   790418.9 KBps
> > File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks    |   367555.6 KBps |   222867.7 KBps
> > File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  |  3675649.7 KBps |  1780614.4 KBps
> > Pipe Throughput                        | 11872208.7 lps  | 11855628.9 lps
> > Pipe-based Context Switching           |  1495126.5 lps  |  1490533.9 lps
> > Process Creation                       |    29881.2 lps  |    28572.8 lps
> > Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)           |    23224.3 lpm  |    22607.4 lpm
> > Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)           |     3531.4 lpm  |     3211.9 lpm
> > System Call Overhead                   | 10385653.0 lps  | 10419979.0 lps
> >
> > Pan Xinhui (5):
> >   kernel/sched: introduce vcpu preempted check interface
> >   locking/osq: Drop the overload of osq_lock()
> >   kernel/locking: Drop the overload of {mutex,rwsem}_spin_on_owner
> >   powerpc/spinlock: support vcpu preempted check
> >   x86, kvm: support vcpu preempted check
> The attached patch adds Xen support for x86. Please tell me whether you
> want to add this patch to your series or if I should post it when your
> series has been accepted.
hi, Juergen
        Your patch is pretty small and nice :) thanks!
I can include your patch into my next patchset after this patchset reviewed. :)


> You can add my
>
> Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
>
> for patches 1-3 and 5 (paravirt parts only).
Thanks a lot!

xinhui

> Juergen
>
> >  arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h   |  8 ++++++++
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h |  6 ++++++
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h       |  8 ++++++++
> >  arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h  |  3 ++-
> >  arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c                 | 11 +++++++++++
> >  arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c            | 11 +++++++++++
> >  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c                    | 12 ++++++++++++
> >  include/linux/sched.h                 | 12 ++++++++++++
> >  kernel/locking/mutex.c                | 15 +++++++++++++--
> >  kernel/locking/osq_lock.c             | 10 +++++++++-
> >  kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c           | 16 +++++++++++++---
> >  11 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel