[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 RESEND] xen-netback: prefer xenbus_scanf() over xenbus_gather()
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@xxxxxxxx] > Sent: 24 October 2016 16:08 > To: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>; Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx; Juergen Gross <JGross@xxxxxxxx>; > netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [PATCH v2 RESEND] xen-netback: prefer xenbus_scanf() over > xenbus_gather() > > For single items being collected this should be preferred as being more > typesafe (as the compiler can check format string and to-be-written-to > variable match) and more efficient (requiring one less parameter to be > passed). > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> > --- > v2: Avoid commit message to continue from subject. > --- > drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c | 14 +++++++------- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > --- 4.9-rc2/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c > +++ 4.9-rc2-xen-netback-prefer-xenbus_scanf/drivers/net/xen- > netback/xenbus.c > @@ -889,16 +889,16 @@ static int connect_ctrl_ring(struct back > unsigned int evtchn; > int err; > > - err = xenbus_gather(XBT_NIL, dev->otherend, > - "ctrl-ring-ref", "%u", &val, NULL); > - if (err) > + err = xenbus_scanf(XBT_NIL, dev->otherend, > + "ctrl-ring-ref", "%u", &val); > + if (err <= 0) Looking at other uses of xenbus_scanf() in the same code I think the check here should be if (err < 0). It's a nit, since xenbus_scanf() cannot return 0, but it would be better for consistency I think. > goto done; /* The frontend does not have a control ring */ > > ring_ref = val; > > - err = xenbus_gather(XBT_NIL, dev->otherend, > - "event-channel-ctrl", "%u", &val, NULL); > - if (err) { > + err = xenbus_scanf(XBT_NIL, dev->otherend, > + "event-channel-ctrl", "%u", &val); > + if (err <= 0) { > xenbus_dev_fatal(dev, err, > "reading %s/event-channel-ctrl", > dev->otherend); > @@ -919,7 +919,7 @@ done: > return 0; > > fail: > - return err; > + return err ?: -ENODATA; I don't think you need this. Paul > } > > static void connect(struct backend_info *be) > > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |