[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.8] tools/oxenstored: Fix transaction handling in 32bit builds
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 08:51:07PM +0000, David Scott wrote: > > > On 31 Oct 2016, at 14:19, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 01:21:56PM +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote: > >> In a 32bit build, the ocaml code 'proposed_id >= 0x7fffffff' compiles to: > >> > >> 8055eac: 83 fb ff cmp $0xffffffff,%ebx > >> 8055eaf: 7d 0f jge 8055ec0 <...+0x20> > >> > >> which in C is 'proposed_id >= INT_MIN', or in other words, tautologically > >> true. As a result, 32bit builds of oxenstored always try to allocate the > >> transaction id 1, and fall into an infinite loop of trying the next id if > >> transaction 1 is already in use. > >> > >> Restrict the range down to 1 billion, to sit in the positive half of a 31 > >> bit > >> ocaml integer. The compiled code is now: > >> > >> 8055eac: b9 ff ff ff 7f mov $0x7fffffff,%ecx > >> 8055eb1: 39 cb cmp %ecx,%ebx > >> 8055eb3: 7d 0b jge 8055ec0 <...+0x20> > >> > >> which (other than non-optimal code generation because of the unnecessary > >> use > >> of %ecx), isn't unconditionally true. > >> > >> In principle, the check could be changed to 'proposed_id == 0x7fffffff' > >> which > >> would still allow for 2 billion transaction in 32bit builds. However, in > >> 64bit builds, this reintroduces a risk that if proposed_id is initially > >> greater than 0x7fffffff, it will not be clipped suitably into range. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Reviewed-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: David Scott <dave@xxxxxxxxxx> > Applied. Thanks. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |