Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools/tests/x86_emulator: Pass -no-pie -fno-pic to gcc

[Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [PATCH] tools/tests/x86_emulator: Pass -no-pie 
-fno-pic to gcc"):
> On 01/11/16 16:58, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [PATCH] tools/tests/x86_emulator: Pass -no-pie 
> > -fno-pic to gcc"):
> >> Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxx> 11/01/16 5:46 PM >>>
> >>> --- a/tools/tests/x86_emulator/Makefile
> >>> +++ b/tools/tests/x86_emulator/Makefile
> >>> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c x86_emulate/x86_emulate.h:
> >>> [ -L x86_emulate ] || ln -sf $(XEN_ROOT)/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate .
> >>  >
> >>> HOSTCFLAGS += $(CFLAGS_xeninclude)
> >>> +HOSTCFLAGS += -no-pie -fno-pic
> >>  
> >> -fno-pic surely has been supported forever, but what about -no-pie? Do all
> >> gcc versions we support / the tools subtree can be built with understand 
> >> it?
> > TBH, I don't know.  You're the one with the ancient compilers, can you
> > check ? :-)  I don't have a gcc that ancient here and checking will be
> > easier than trying to divine the answer from changelogs.
> 
> Also, any reason why this isn't on-list?

My original mail was mistakenly not on-list.  Jan replied to that
rather than the followup.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel