[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86emul: {L, S}{G, I}DT ignore operand size overrides in 64-bit mode
>>> On 02.11.16 at 18:42, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 02/11/16 16:12, Jan Beulich wrote: >> This affects not only the layout of the data (always 2+8 bytes), but >> also the contents (no truncation to 24 bits occurs). >> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, although > wouldn't it be cleaner to set op_bytes = def_op_bytes, than to keep > referring back to mode_64()? That would still mean if ( mode_64bit() ) op_bytes = def_op_bytes; and wouldn't eliminate the uses in the second ops->write() / read_ulong() either. What we could do in the S{G,I}DT case is if ( mode_64bit() ) op_bytes = 8; else if ( op_bytes == 2 ) { sreg.base &= 0xffffff; op_bytes = 4; } if ( (rc = ops->write(ea.mem.seg, ea.mem.off+0, &sreg.limit, 2, ctxt)) || (rc = ops->write(ea.mem.seg, ea.mem.off+2, &sreg.base, op_bytes, ctxt)) ) But the same can't be done in the L{G,I}DT case. Let me know. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |