[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.8 1/2] x86/vmx: Correct the long mode check in vmx_cpuid_intercept()



%cs.L may be set in a legacy mode segment, or clear in a compatibility mode
segment; it is not the correct way to check for long mode being active.

Both of these situations result in incorrect visibility of the SYSCALL feature
in CPUID, and by extension, incorrect behaviour in hvm_efer_valid().

Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
CC: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx>
CC: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
index 9a8f694..a18db28 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -2407,7 +2407,6 @@ static void vmx_cpuid_intercept(
     unsigned int *ecx, unsigned int *edx)
 {
     unsigned int input = *eax;
-    struct segment_register cs;
     struct vcpu *v = current;
 
     hvm_cpuid(input, eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
@@ -2416,8 +2415,7 @@ static void vmx_cpuid_intercept(
     {
         case 0x80000001:
             /* SYSCALL is visible iff running in long mode. */
-            vmx_get_segment_register(v, x86_seg_cs, &cs);
-            if ( cs.attr.fields.l )
+            if ( hvm_long_mode_enabled(v) )
                 *edx |= cpufeat_mask(X86_FEATURE_SYSCALL);
             else
                 *edx &= ~(cpufeat_mask(X86_FEATURE_SYSCALL));
-- 
2.1.4


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.