[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] libacpi: Be specific about which DSDT files to build

To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 06:17:28 +0000
Cc: lars.kurth@xxxxxxxxxx, wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx, andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx, ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, jbeulich@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 06:17:38 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:52:27PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> There is no reason to build, for example, dsdt_pvh.asl for hvmloader. We
> pass which DSDTs to build via DSDT_FILES parameter.
> 
> If DSDT_FILES is empty all DSDTs for a particular architecture will be built.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>

This doesn't seem to be strictly necessary for 4.8 though.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] libacpi: Be specific about which DSDT files to build
  - From: Boris Ostrovsky

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] libacpi updates
  - From: Boris Ostrovsky
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] libacpi: Be specific about which DSDT files to build
  - From: Boris Ostrovsky

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] tools/libacpi: Re-licence remaining GPL code to LGPLv2.1
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/x86: Increase xen_e820_map to E820_X_MAX possible entries
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] libacpi: Be specific about which DSDT files to build
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] libacpi: Be specific about which DSDT files to build
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.