Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 08/11] pvh/acpi: Handle ACPI accesses for PVH guests

[Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 11/15/2016 10:17 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> The other option was XEN_X86_EMU_ACPI. Would it be better?
> As that's a little too wide (and I think someone else had also
> disliked it for that reason), how about XEN_X86_EMU_ACPI_FF
> (for "fixed features"), or if that's still too wide, break things up
> (PM1a, PM1b, PM2, TMR, GPE0, GPE1)?

I think this may be a bit too fine-grained. Fixed-features would be
good, but is GPE block considered part of fixed features?

-boris


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel