Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v1] libxl: Make an ACPI support build for ARM64 configurable.

[Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>]

Hello Andrii,

On 23/11/16 14:12, Andrii Anisov wrote:
> > But before you write any code, let me try to understand the real issue
> > first: you're trying to cross-build ARM tools on x86, but x86
> > iasl doesn't support ARM ACPI definition(s), right?
> Well, as I stated here [1], I'm pretty far from ACPI and understanding
> of what's going wrong with the compilation. But I have a strong
> feeling that this option should be optional.
The ACPI support is pretty much contained in a single file and I am not 
sure you will win much space. Can you explain why the ACPI guest support 
should be optional?
Regards,

> [1] https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-11/msg01903.html
>
> Sincerely,
> Andrii Anisov.
--
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel