[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4/4] xen/x86: Correct mandatory and SMP barrier definitions

To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: David Vrabel <dvrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 12:01:43 +0000
Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 05 Dec 2016 12:01:49 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

On 05/12/16 10:05, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>
> + *  Loads may be reordered ahead of an unaliasing store.

It might be useful to summarize what an "unaliasing store" is.

David


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4/4] xen/x86: Correct mandatory and SMP barrier definitions
  - From: Andrew Cooper

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] Fixes to common and x86 barriers
  - From: Andrew Cooper
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4/4] xen/x86: Correct mandatory and SMP barrier definitions
  - From: Andrew Cooper

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/8] x86/hvm: Assert some expectations in hvm_inject_event()
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4/8] x86/emul: Drop the last remaining uses of bool_t
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4/4] xen/x86: Correct mandatory and SMP barrier definitions
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4/4] xen/x86: Correct mandatory and SMP barrier definitions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.