[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v1] arm/irq: Reorder check when the IRQ is already used by someone
On Mon, 5 Dec 2016, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Oleksandr, > > On 02/12/16 16:38, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote: > > Call irq_get_domain for the IRQ we are interested in > > only after making sure that it is the guest IRQ to avoid > > ASSERT(test_bit(_IRQ_GUEST, &desc->status)) triggering. > > > > Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@xxxxxxxx> > > I forgot to mention that your Signed-off-by does not match the From. > In the future, please make sure that the author e-mail (the From) is listed in > the signed-off. CC'ing Lars. Actually I don't think this is required: Signed-off-by is about copyright ownership, that is where using the company email is important. But I don't think it is necessary for the authorship, that is what From: is about. Authorship is just to give credit to the author, it could be a pseudonym, I think. I am pretty sure that I have seen other instances of this on the LKML. For example: Alice works for Bob Alice writes a patch, Bob has copyright ownership Chris takes Alice's patch and sends it to xen-devel Chris should use its own email address in the email From: field; he uses Alice's email address (doesn't matter which) in the From: field within the patch; he should use Bob's email as Signed-off-by: From: Chris Subject: [PATCH] fix something From: Alice This patch fixes something Signed-off-by: Bob _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |