[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/HVM: drop hvm_emulate_one_no_write()

To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 15:40:47 +0000
Cc: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 15:50:39 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

On 06/12/16 12:47, Jan Beulich wrote:
> It was pointlessly non-static, and being static and a simple wrapper it
> can as well be folded into its single caller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/HVM: drop hvm_emulate_one_no_write()
  - From: Jan Beulich

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: make more use of wr{f,g}sbase()
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 21/24] ARM: vITS: handle INVALL command
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/HVM: drop hvm_emulate_one_no_write()
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/HVM: drop __hvm_clear()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.