[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] x86emul: derive vcpu_must_have() from vcpu_has()

To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 12:53:40 +0000
Delivery-date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 12:53:56 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

On 09/12/16 11:53, Jan Beulich wrote:
> ... to avoid introducing further redundancy when adding further feature
> flag checks, and to bring its use better in line with its host_and_*()
> sibling.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] x86emul: feature flag handling adjustments
  - From: Jan Beulich
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] x86emul: derive vcpu_must_have() from vcpu_has()
  - From: Jan Beulich

Prev by Date: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86emul: avoid numeric literals for EFLAGS values
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.9 Development Update
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] x86emul: derive vcpu_must_have() from vcpu_has()
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] x86: drop cpu_has_sse{,2}
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.