[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 4/5] x86/PV: use generic emulator for privileged instruction handling
On 13/12/16 11:28, Jan Beulich wrote: > +static int priv_op_insn_fetch(enum x86_segment seg, > + unsigned long offset, > + void *p_data, > + unsigned int bytes, > + struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt) > +{ > + const struct priv_op_ctxt *poc = > + container_of(ctxt, struct priv_op_ctxt, ctxt); > + unsigned int rc; > + unsigned long addr = poc->cs.base + offset; > + > + ASSERT(seg == x86_seg_cs); > + > + /* We don't mean to emulate any branches. */ > + if ( !bytes ) > + return X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE; > + > + rc = pv_emul_virt_to_linear(poc->cs.base, offset, bytes, poc->cs.limit, > + x86_seg_cs, ctxt, &addr); > + if ( rc != X86EMUL_OKAY ) > + return rc; > + > + if ( (rc = __copy_from_user(p_data, (void *)addr, bytes)) != 0 ) > + { > + x86_emul_pagefault(cpu_has_nx ? PFEC_insn_fetch : 0, > + addr + bytes - rc, ctxt); Please can we retain the 0 and comment here. > --- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c > @@ -1185,7 +1185,7 @@ static int ioport_access_check( > > fail_if(ops->read_segment == NULL); > if ( (rc = ops->read_segment(x86_seg_tr, &tr, ctxt)) != 0 ) > - return rc; > + return rc == X86EMUL_DONE ? X86EMUL_OKAY : rc; Please have at least a comment here /* Used by the PV path to defer the port permission check to the ioport hooks. */ > > /* Ensure the TSS has an io-bitmap-offset field. */ > generate_exception_if(tr.attr.fields.type != 0xb, EXC_GP, 0); > Other than that, subject to double checking the IOPL behaviour, Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |