Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 04/13] pvh/acpi: Install handlers for ACPI-related PVH IO accesses

[Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 12/20/2016 06:24 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 17.12.16 at 00:18, <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> --- a/xen/include/public/arch-x86/hvm/save.h
>> +++ b/xen/include/public/arch-x86/hvm/save.h
>> @@ -527,7 +527,37 @@ DECLARE_HVM_SAVE_TYPE(HPET, 12, struct hvm_hw_hpet);
>>  /*
>>   * PM timer
>>   */
>> +#if __XEN_INTERFACE_VERSION__ >= 0x00040800
>> +struct hvm_hw_pmtimer {
>> +    uint32_t tmr_val;   /* PM_TMR_BLK.TMR_VAL: 32bit free-running counter */
>> +    uint16_t pm1a_sts;  /* PM1a_EVT_BLK.PM1a_STS: status register */
>> +    uint16_t pm1a_en;   /* PM1a_EVT_BLK.PM1a_EN: enable register */
>> +#if defined(__XEN__) || defined(__XEN_TOOLS__)
>> +    uint16_t gpe0_sts;
>> +    uint16_t gpe0_en;
>> +#endif
> Why inside another #ifdef? There's no other example in this file
> which might have suggested to you that it needs doing this way.
> In fact there are also no pre-existing uses of
> __XEN_INTERFACE_VERSION__ in this header, so I also don't see
> why you added one (and then with a slightly off value check).

Don't we want users of old interface to continue using original
definition of hvm_hw_timer? And not to expose them to the fix routine below?

-boris

>
> If anything the _whole_ header would need to become Xen/tools
> only.
>
>> +static inline int _hvm_hw_fix_pmtimer(void *h, uint32_t size)
>> +{
>> +#if defined(__XEN__) || defined(__XEN_TOOLS__)
>> +    struct hvm_hw_pmtimer *acpi = (struct hvm_hw_pmtimer *)h;
>> +
>> +    if ( size == sizeof(struct hvm_hw_pmtimer_compat) )
>> +        acpi->gpe0_sts = acpi->gpe0_en = 0;
>> +#endif
> Same here.
>
> Jan
>



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel