[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4] x86/apicv: fix RTC periodic timer and apicv issue
>-----Original Message----- >From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@xxxxxxxx] >Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2017 3:35 PM >To: Xuquan (Quan Xu) >Cc: Andrew Cooper; George Dunlap; yang.zhang.wz@xxxxxxxxx; Chao Gao; >Jun Nakajima; Kevin Tian; Lan Tianyu; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: RE: [PATCH v4] x86/apicv: fix RTC periodic timer and apicv issue > >>>> On 23.12.16 at 13:24, <xuquan8@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On December 22, 2016 4:12 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>>> On 21.12.16 at 06:44, <xuquan8@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/intr.c >>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/intr.c >>>> @@ -315,9 +315,13 @@ void vmx_intr_assist(void) >>>> * Set eoi_exit_bitmap for periodic timer interrup to cause >>>EOI-induced VM >>>> * exit, then pending periodic time interrups have the >>>> chance >>>to be injected >>>> * for compensation >>>> + * Set eoi_exit_bitmap for intack.vector when it's higher >>>> + than >>>pending >>>> + * periodic time interrupts. This way we can guarantee >>>> + there's >>>always a chance >>>> + * to post periodic time interrupts when periodic time >>>interrupts becomes the >>>> + * highest one >>>> */ >>>> if (pt_vector != -1) >>>> - vmx_set_eoi_exit_bitmap(v, pt_vector); >>>> + vmx_set_eoi_exit_bitmap(v, intack.vector); >>> >>>The comment does not clarify why max(pt_vector, intack.vector) is not >>>needed. And I'd expect you to add ASSERT(intack.vector >= pt_vector) >>>then, to prove this (and one might argue that this addition could be >>>sufficient documentation, albeit perhaps a brief comment next to the >>>assertion would help readers of this non-trivial piece of code). >>> >> Kevin or Jan.. >> ASSERT(...) is ok to me.. Could you help me give a brief comment? > >I don't see why you couldn't simply use what Kevin said in reply to my >earlier question regarding the lack of max() here. > What about """ Set EOI exit bitmap for any vector which may block injection of pt_vector - give a chance to recognize pt_vector in future intack and then do pt interrupts post"""? Quan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |