[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86emul: use unambiguous register names
>>> On 03.01.17 at 15:12, <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On 03.01.17 at 14:30, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 03/01/17 13:01, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> @@ -2716,36 +2716,36 @@ x86_emulate( >>> struct segment_register cs, sreg; >>> >>> case 0x00 ... 0x05: add: /* add */ >>> - emulate_2op_SrcV("add", src, dst, _regs.eflags); >>> + emulate_2op_SrcV("add", src, dst, _regs.r(flags)); >>> break; >>> >> >> All of these types of operations only adjust the arithmetic flags, so >> could legitimately use eflags alone. Is it worth reducing? > > Yes, but not now and here: Using _eflags breaks the inline asm which > these macros resolve to. Actually, after some staring at those macros I think this might be relatively simple to deal with, so let me see if I can put together a prereq patch allowing _eflags to be used here instead. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |