Re: [Xen-devel] Future support of 5-level paging in Xen

[anshul makkar <anshul.makkar@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 08/12/16 23:40, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 12/08/2016 05:21 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > On 08/12/2016 19:18, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > Of course even the largest virtual machine today (2TB on Amazon AFAIK)
> > > is not close to reaching the current memory limit, but it's just a
> > > matter of time.
> > /me things Oracle will have something to say about this.  I'm sure there
> > was talk about VMs larger than this at previous hackathons. XenServer
> > functions (ish, so long as you don't migrate) with 6TB VMs, although
> > starting and shutting them down feels like treacle.
>
>
> I've been working (on and off) with SGI to get one of their 32TB boxes 
> to boot and I don't think that works. We've fixed a couple of bugs but 
> I don't think Xen can boot with that much memory. We successfully 
> booted with just under 8TB but couldn't do it with the full system. 
> The machine has been taken from us for now so this work is on hold.
> This is on OVM, which is 4.4-based, we haven't tried (IIRC) latest bits.
>
> (BTW, speaking of slow starting and shutting down very large guests ---
> have you or anyone else had a chance to look at this? My investigation 
> initially pointed to scrubbing and then to an insane number of 
> hypercall preemptions in relinquish_memory()).
I had a quick look at it when I was working on support for large guest 
and found that scrubbing was indeed one of the issue. Just haven't got 
time to look at it in more details. Hopefully in near future, might work 
on it.
> -boris
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel