Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 03/10] x86/HVM: Call vlapic_destroy after vcpu_destroy

[Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx>]

On 01/05/2017 10:56 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 31.12.16 at 06:45, <suravee.suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Since vlapic_init() is called before vcpu_initialise().
> > We should call the destroy functions in the the reverse order here.
> Double "the". And to quote from my RFC reply:
>
> "Also the ordering issue extends to other calls, and I think if at all
>  possible we should then do all the teardown in reverse order of
>  init."
>
> Is there anything preventing this?
>
> Jan
Ah, sorry. I didn't get what you tried to say earlier. I see now that 
you want to change the teardown order in hvm_vcpu_destroy() to follow 
the teardown order (i.e. the "failX:") in hvm_vcpu_initialize().
Thanks,
Suravee

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel