[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 03/10] x86/HVM: Call vlapic_destroy after vcpu_destroy





On 01/05/2017 10:56 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 31.12.16 at 06:45, <suravee.suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Since vlapic_init() is called before vcpu_initialise().
We should call the destroy functions in the the reverse order here.

Double "the". And to quote from my RFC reply:

"Also the ordering issue extends to other calls, and I think if at all
 possible we should then do all the teardown in reverse order of
 init."

Is there anything preventing this?

Jan


Ah, sorry. I didn't get what you tried to say earlier. I see now that you want to change the teardown order in hvm_vcpu_destroy() to follow the teardown order (i.e. the "failX:") in hvm_vcpu_initialize().

Thanks,
Suravee

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.