Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v2] Xen PV Drivers Lifecycle

[Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 4 Jan 2017, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jan 2017, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 10:00:01AM -0800, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > as you know, we have an issue with the speed of review and acceptance of
> > > new PV drivers. In a discussion among committers, George wrote an email
> > > with a short proposal to clarify the development lifecycle of new PV
> > > drivers and the different expectations at each stage of the process. I
> > > took that email, polished it and turned it into markdown. Here it is.
> > > 
> > > ---
> > > Acks:
> > > +1 from Wei Liu
> > 
> > +1.
> > 
> > Albeit I am concerned about the 
> > ..
> > > from one stage to the next within a reasonable time frame unless someone
> > 
> > .. of what 'reasonable time' is when somebody is on vacation
> > or sick.
> > 
> > Is it worth spelling that out?
> 
> I don't think we should introduce hard time limits, but it should be in
> terms of few months, not years.

We have only had positive feedback so far and two explicit +1's. Should
we call "lazy-consensus" and commit it?

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel