|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 5/5] fix: add multiboot2 protocol support for EFI platforms
>>> On 17.01.17 at 21:07, <cardoe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/boot/head.S
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/boot/head.S
> @@ -519,6 +519,7 @@ trampoline_setup:
> 1:
> /* Switch to low-memory stack. */
> mov sym_phys(trampoline_phys),%edi
> + /* The stack base is 64kb after the location of trampoline_phys */
> lea 0x10000(%edi),%esp
I'm sorry for being picky, but the stack _base_ isn't where the stack
pointer should point initially, or else there would be no room on the
stack at all. Perhaps you had a reason for not using the wording I
did suggest, but whatever wording is chosen should not risk to cause
confusion (otherwise I think we'd be better off not adding any
comment here).
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/efi/efi-boot.h
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/efi/efi-boot.h
> @@ -146,8 +146,6 @@ static void __init
> efi_arch_process_memory_map(EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE *SystemTable,
> {
> struct e820entry *e;
> unsigned int i;
> - /* Check for extra mem for mbi data if Xen is loaded via multiboot2
> protocol. */
> - UINTN extra_mem = efi_enabled(EFI_LOADER) ? 0 : (64 << 10);
>
> /* Populate E820 table and check trampoline area availability. */
> e = e820map - 1;
> @@ -170,8 +168,7 @@ static void __init
> efi_arch_process_memory_map(EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE *SystemTable,
> /* fall through */
> case EfiConventionalMemory:
> if ( !trampoline_phys && desc->PhysicalStart + len <= 0x100000 &&
> - len >= cfg.size + extra_mem &&
> - desc->PhysicalStart + len > cfg.addr )
> + len >= cfg.size && desc->PhysicalStart + len > cfg.addr )
> cfg.addr = (desc->PhysicalStart + len - cfg.size) &
> PAGE_MASK;
> /* fall through */
> case EfiLoaderCode:
> @@ -686,6 +683,10 @@ paddr_t __init efi_multiboot2(EFI_HANDLE ImageHandle,
> EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE *SystemTa
> setup_efi_pci();
> efi_variables();
>
> + /* This is the maximum size of our trampoline + our low memory stack */
> + cfg.size = max_t(UINTN, 64 << 10,
> + (trampoline_end - trampoline_start) + 4096);
Considering the consuming code further up, I don't understand the
reason for the addition of 4096 here. And if there is a reason, I'm
pretty sure you actually mean PAGE_SIZE.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |