Re: [Xen-devel] xennet_start_xmit assumptions

[Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sowmini Varadhan [mailto:sowmini.varadhan@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 19 January 2017 11:14
> To: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>; Wei Liu
> <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; xen-
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] xennet_start_xmit assumptions
> 
> On (01/19/17 09:36), Paul Durrant wrote:
> >
> > Hi Sowmini,
> >
> >   Sounds like a straightforward bug to me... netfront should be able
> > to handle an empty skb and clearly, if it's relying on skb_headlen()
> > being non-zero, that's not the case.
> >
> >   Paul
> 
> I see. Seems like there are 2 things broken here: recovering
> from skb->len = 0, and recovering from  the more complex
> case of (skb->len > 0 && skb_headlen(skb) == 0)
> 
> Do you folks want to take a shot at fixing this,
> since you know the code better? If you are interested,
> I can share my test program to help you reproduce the
> simpler skb->len == 0 case, but it's the fully non-linear
> skbs that may be more interesting to reproduce/fix.

Sowmini,

Yeah, it would be useful to verify any change fixes the particular issue you're 
seeing so please share the program. For the non-empty non-linear case I'd hope 
that catching this and doing a pull of some sensible amount of header (which 
might coincide with the least amount that netback expects to see in the first 
frag) would be enough.
I can take a shot at a patch for this in the next few days; I'll add your 
'Reported-by' so you should get cc-ed.

Cheers,

  Paul

> 
> I'll probably work on fixing packet_snd to return -EINVAL
> or similar when the len is zero this week.
> 
> --Sowmini


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel