[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 104237: regressions - FAIL

To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 16:01:29 -0500
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 21:01:57 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

>
> So I can see 2 solutions:
>     1) Increase the timeout
>     2) Only build the kernel on the Arndales. Though they are known to
> be unreliable in the colo :/
>
> Any opinions?

I'd vote for (1). Alternatively we could cross-compile on an x86 box.

-boris


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 104237: regressions - FAIL
  - From: osstest service owner
- Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 104237: regressions - FAIL
  - From: Boris Ostrovsky
- Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 104237: regressions - FAIL
  - From: Ian Jackson
- Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 104237: regressions - FAIL
  - From: Boris Ostrovsky
- Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 104237: regressions - FAIL
  - From: Boris Ostrovsky
- Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 104237: regressions - FAIL
  - From: Julien Grall

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 104237: regressions - FAIL
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 104282: regressions - trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 104237: regressions - FAIL
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 104237: regressions - FAIL
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.