[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] memory hotplug for domUs
Recently Jim asked me why he can use "xl mem-max" to raise the allowed memory size of a domain in the hypervisor above the configured maxmem limit of the domain, but not use "xl mem-set" to balloon the domain up to this value later. I thought libxl_domain_setmaxmem() being buggy as it doesn't modify the memory/static-max value in Xenstore and posted a patch adding the Xenstore modification. Later I had an IRC discussion with Ian on #xendevel with the following outcome: xl mem-max is defined to do things as it does without my patch. OTOH this is documented very poorly. I'll send a patch enhancing the xl man page in this regard. For support of memory hotplug in a domain (adding memory above the current defined maximum memory as in Xenstore memory/static-max) we decided to add a new option to xl. Basically doing such a kind of memory hotplug requires the capability of the guest to support this feature. PV Linux kernel has support for it if the kernel has been built with CONFIG_XEN_BALLOON_MEMORY_HOTPLUG set. For HVM guests support is more difficult as there has to be some reserved space in the memory map of the guest for hotplugged memory. Ian suggested to let the guest write a Xenstore entry indicating support of memory hotplug in order for Xen tools to decide whether such an operation should be supported. As this entry isn't being written by current kernels which do support hotplug there has to be some kind of "force" flag to override the test for presence of the Xenstore entry. We first thought to enhance "xl mem-set", but after some more thinking about it I'd rather add a new xl command, e.g. "mem-add" (we could later even add "mem-remove" to support memory unplug). xl mem-add would add the specified amount of memory to a running domain and it would raise memory/static-max accordingly. The first version would support PV domains only, but future support for HVM could be possible (the domain configuration would have to be enhanced to create a memory map entry indicating hot-pluggable memory). Other future enhancements would include the possibility to add memory to a vnuma node of the domain, possibly taking the memory from a specified numa node of the host. In case this proposal is accepted I can write patches (libxl and Linux kernel). Juergen _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |