[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 03/26] ARM: GICv3 ITS: allocate device and collection table



Hi Andre,

On 20/01/2017 12:27, Andre Przywara wrote:
On 20/01/17 11:12, Julien Grall wrote:
Hello,

On 04/01/2017 22:47, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Thu, 22 Dec 2016, Andre Przywara wrote:
Each ITS maps a pair of a DeviceID (usually the PCI b/d/f triplet) and
an EventID (the MSI payload or interrupt ID) to a pair of LPI number
and collection ID, which points to the target CPU.
This mapping is stored in the device and collection tables, which
software
has to provide for the ITS to use.
Allocate the required memory and hand it the ITS.
The maximum number of devices is limited to a compile-time constant
exposed in Kconfig.

Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx>
---
 xen/arch/arm/Kconfig          |   6 +++
 xen/arch/arm/gic-its.c        | 114
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 xen/arch/arm/gic-v3.c         |   5 ++
 xen/include/asm-arm/bitops.h  |   1 +
 xen/include/asm-arm/gic-its.h |  51 ++++++++++++++++++-
 5 files changed, 176 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/Kconfig b/xen/arch/arm/Kconfig
index a7d941c..a369305 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/Kconfig
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/Kconfig
@@ -59,6 +59,12 @@ config MAX_HOST_LPI_BITS
           This can be overriden on the command line with the
max_lpi_bits
           parameter.

+config MAX_ITS_PCI_BUSSES
+        depends on HAS_ITS
+        int "Number of PCI busses the ITS supports (4)"
+        range 1 1024
+        default "4"

Given that any kind of devices can be behind an ITS, including non-PCI
devices, I think it is best to call this MAX_PHYS_ITS_DEVICES.

I don't think we should limit the number of devices supported at
compilation time. We aim to have a single Xen binary running on any
board. The best would be to guess the number at runtime, but I would be
fine with a command line options.

Yes, so I changed this already to specify the number of devices and will
now also add a command line option.
So do you want to get rid of the Kconfig entirely to just go with
#define-ing the default value in the code?
Or do we still want to have this easily accessible way of changing the
default, at least for the first time to simplify experimentation?

Before answering to your questions, I'd like to understand why you need to have this value hardcoded or coming from the command line? Can't this be figured out at runtime?

Also what is this issue to use the number of ID bits presented in TYPER? Is it because your series is only handling flat table, so a large amount of memory would be used?

Regards,

--
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.