[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] Commit 3a6c9 breaks QEMU on FreeBSD/Xen
Hello, The following commit: commit 3a6c9172ac5951e6dac2b3f6cbce3cfccdec5894 Author: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx> Date: Tue Nov 22 07:10:58 2016 +0100 xen: create qdev for each backend device Prevents me from running QEMU on FreeBSD/Xen, the following is printed on the QEMU log: char device redirected to /dev/pts/2 (label serial0) xen be core: xen be core: can't open gnttab device can't open gnttab device xen be core: xen be core: can't open gnttab device can't open gnttab device # xl create -c ~/domain.cfg Parsing config from /root/domain.cfg libxl: error: libxl_dm.c:2201:device_model_spawn_outcome: Domain 32:domain 32 device model: spawn failed (rc=-3) libxl: error: libxl_create.c:1506:domcreate_devmodel_started: Domain 32:device model did not start: -3 libxl: error: libxl_dm.c:2315:kill_device_model: Device Model already exited libxl: error: libxl.c:1572:libxl__destroy_domid: Domain 32:Non-existant domain libxl: error: libxl.c:1531:domain_destroy_callback: Domain 32:Unable to destroy guest libxl: error: libxl.c:1458:domain_destroy_cb: Domain 32:Destruction of domain failed # cat /var/log/xen/qemu-dm-domain.log char device redirected to /dev/pts/2 (label serial0) xen be core: xen be core: can't open gnttab device can't open gnttab device xen be core: xen be core: can't open gnttab device can't open gnttab device I'm not really familiar with any of that code, but I think that using qdev_init_nofail is wrong, since on FreeBSD/Xen for example we don't yet support the gnttab device, so initialization of the Xen Qdisk backend can fail (and possibly the same applies to Linux if someone decides to compile a kernel without the gnttab device). Yet QEMU can be used without the Qdisk backend. Roger. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |