[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/5] hotplug/linux: Improve iptables logic
Sylvain Munaut writes ("Re: [PATCH 3/5] hotplug/linux: Improve iptables logic"): > I used the "any" keywords because when you add v6 you need to > differentiate the case "none" allowed and "any" allowed to support the > case where only v6 or only v4 is allowed. So you can't just rely on > having an empty variable any more since it's more a "tri-state". I think this comes out in the wash in my approach. It is still necessary to test an address for v4 or v6 format in the addition loop. > I'd have to see how it works with v6 and user customization but I'm > not going to implement the v6 and redo all the testing purely to see > if it's at best equivalent in my eyes. If you have a test setup, and I redid the v6 things to meet your goals as you explain above, would you retest it ? Thanks, Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |