[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] xen, input: try to read screen resolution for xen-kbdfront
On 27/01/17 09:26, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: > On 01/27/2017 10:14 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: >> On 27/01/17 08:53, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: >>> On 01/27/2017 09:46 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: >>>> On 27/01/17 08:21, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: >>>>> On 01/27/2017 09:12 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: >>>>>> Instead of using the default resolution of 800*600 for the pointing >>>>>> device of xen-kbdfront try to read the resolution of the (virtual) >>>>>> framebuffer device. Use the default as fallback only. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> V2: get framebuffer resolution only if CONFIG_FB (Dmitry Torokhov) >>>>>> --- >>>>>> drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- >>>>>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c >>>>>> b/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c >>>>>> index 3900875..3aae9b4 100644 >>>>>> --- a/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c >>>>>> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c >>>>>> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ >>>>>> #include <linux/kernel.h> >>>>>> #include <linux/errno.h> >>>>>> #include <linux/module.h> >>>>>> +#include <linux/fb.h> >>>>>> #include <linux/input.h> >>>>>> #include <linux/slab.h> >>>>>> @@ -108,7 +109,7 @@ static irqreturn_t input_handler(int rq, void >>>>>> *dev_id) >>>>>> static int xenkbd_probe(struct xenbus_device *dev, >>>>>> const struct xenbus_device_id *id) >>>>>> { >>>>>> - int ret, i; >>>>>> + int ret, i, width, height; >>>>>> unsigned int abs; >>>>>> struct xenkbd_info *info; >>>>>> struct input_dev *kbd, *ptr; >>>>>> @@ -173,9 +174,17 @@ static int xenkbd_probe(struct xenbus_device >>>>>> *dev, >>>>>> ptr->id.product = 0xfffe; >>>>>> if (abs) { >>>>>> + width = XENFB_WIDTH; >>>>>> + height = XENFB_HEIGHT; >>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_FB >>>>>> + if (registered_fb[0]) { >>>>> This still will not help if FB gets registered after kbd+ptr >>>> Hmm, so you think I should add a call to fb_register_client() to get >>>> events for new registered framebuffer devices? >>> yes, but also pay attention to CONFIG_FB_NOTIFY: you may still >>> end up w/o notification. >> Okay, that's not worse than today. > agree >>>> This would probably work. I'll have a try. >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Juergen >>> My bigger concern here is that we try to tie keyboard and pointer device >>> to the framebuffer. IMO, these are independent parts of the system and >>> the relation >>> depends on the use-case. One can have graphics enabled w/o framebuffer >>> at all, e.g. >>> DRM/KMS + OpenGLES + Weston + kbd + ptr... >> Again: that's a use case which will work as today. The current defaults >> are being used. >> >> The question is whether we should add a module parameter switching off >> the automatic adaption of the resolution as there might be use cases >> where we don't want this feature. > I think for those who doesn't want this resolution there is > still a possibility to change it on backend's XenbusStateConnected > So, no need for module parameter, IMO Fine. I'll send V3 soon. Juergen _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |