Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 105080: regressions - FAIL

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 31.01.17 at 14:50, <osstest-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> flight 105080 xen-unstable real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/105080/ 
> 
> Regressions :-(
> 
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 9 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 
> 104681
>  test-amd64-i386-libvirt-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 9 debian-hvm-install fail 
> REGR. vs. 104681
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 9 debian-hvm-install fail 
> REGR. vs. 104681

I've looked at this specific one's log, and there's no XSM-related
failure there anymore afaics. I can't see any failure indication
there at all, yet the guest clearly doesn't reboot when it's
expected to. The only other x86 test failing but not matching
test-amd64-i386-* is test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64,
so do we have to suspect a qemut issue along with the suspected
32-bit Dom0 one? Otoh there are several succeeding
test-amd64-amd64-*-qemut-*-amd64.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel