[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86emul: correct behavior for single iteration REP INS/OUTS
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 03:59:16AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > The initial operation done on these paths may raise an exception (for > ->read_io() that's possible only on the PV path, when the I/O port > access check has been deferred). We have to suppress put_rep_prefix() > updating rCX in that case. From an abstract perspective this also > applies to RETRY being returned. > > Reported-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> Tested-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c > @@ -3116,7 +3116,7 @@ x86_emulate( > if ( nr_reps == 1 && ops->read_io && ops->write ) > { > rc = ops->read_io(port, dst.bytes, &dst.val, ctxt); > - if ( rc == X86EMUL_OKAY ) > + if ( rc != X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE ) > nr_reps = 0; > } > if ( (nr_reps > 1 || rc == X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE) && ops->rep_ins ) > @@ -3157,7 +3157,7 @@ x86_emulate( > { > rc = read_ulong(ea.mem.seg, ea.mem.off, &dst.val, dst.bytes, > ctxt, ops); > - if ( rc == X86EMUL_OKAY ) > + if ( rc != X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE ) > nr_reps = 0; > } > if ( (nr_reps > 1 || rc == X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE) && ops->rep_outs ) > > > > x86emul: correct behavior for single iteration REP INS/OUTS > > The initial operation done on these paths may raise an exception (for > ->read_io() that's possible only on the PV path, when the I/O port > access check has been deferred). We have to suppress put_rep_prefix() > updating rCX in that case. From an abstract perspective this also > applies to RETRY being returned. > > Reported-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> > > --- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c > @@ -3116,7 +3116,7 @@ x86_emulate( > if ( nr_reps == 1 && ops->read_io && ops->write ) > { > rc = ops->read_io(port, dst.bytes, &dst.val, ctxt); > - if ( rc == X86EMUL_OKAY ) > + if ( rc != X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE ) > nr_reps = 0; > } > if ( (nr_reps > 1 || rc == X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE) && ops->rep_ins ) > @@ -3157,7 +3157,7 @@ x86_emulate( > { > rc = read_ulong(ea.mem.seg, ea.mem.off, &dst.val, dst.bytes, > ctxt, ops); > - if ( rc == X86EMUL_OKAY ) > + if ( rc != X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE ) > nr_reps = 0; > } > if ( (nr_reps > 1 || rc == X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE) && ops->rep_outs ) _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |