Re: [Xen-devel] [DOC v4] Xen transport for 9pfs

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> ## Ring Setup
> 
> The shared page has the following layout:
> 
>     typedef uint32_t XEN_9PFS_RING_IDX;
> 
>     struct xen_9pfs_intf {
>       XEN_9PFS_RING_IDX in_cons, in_prod;
>       uint8_t pad[56];
>       XEN_9PFS_RING_IDX out_cons, out_prod;
> 
>       uint32_t ring_order;
>         /* this is an array of (1 << ring_order) elements */
>       grant_ref_t ref[1];
>     };
> 
>     /* not actually C compliant (ring_order changes from ring to ring) */
>     struct ring_data {
>         char in[((1 << ring_order) << PAGE_SHIFT) / 2];
>         char out[((1 << ring_order) << PAGE_SHIFT) / 2];
>     };
> 

This is the same comment about the the PV Calls structure.

Would it make sense to add the 'in_events' and 'out_events'
as a notification mechanism?


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel