[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/bitops: Force __scanbit() to be always inline
>>> On 10.02.17 at 12:44, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It turns out that GCCs 4.9.2 and 6.3.0 instantiate __scanbit() in three > translation units, but never references the result. All real uses of > __scanbit() are already suitably inline. While I'm not opposed to this at all, we should set ourselves a reasonably clear rule of thumb of when to use always_inline. As was noted the other day, mixing (apparently arbitrarily) with normal inline functions is at least confusing to the reader. For that it may be necessary to understand what exactly it is that makes gcc create (even unreferenced) static function instances. Jan > Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |