[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 4/4] build: enable no-parentheses in clang
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 06:56:12AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 14.02.17 at 13:30, <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > --- a/Config.mk > > +++ b/Config.mk > > @@ -212,9 +212,6 @@ CFLAGS += -std=gnu99 > > > > CFLAGS += -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes > > > > -# Clang complains about macros that expand to 'if ( ( foo == bar ) ) ...' > > -CFLAGS-$(clang) += -Wno-parentheses > > Taking the comment being removed here together with .... > > > --- a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c > > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c > > @@ -2011,7 +2011,7 @@ uint32_t guest_io_read(unsigned int port, unsigned > > int bytes, > > { > > sub_data = pv_pit_handler(port, 0, 0); > > } > > - else if ( (port == RTC_PORT(0)) ) > > + else if ( port == RTC_PORT(0) ) > > { > > sub_data = currd->arch.cmos_idx; > > } > > @@ -2080,7 +2080,7 @@ void guest_io_write(unsigned int port, unsigned int > > bytes, uint32_t data, > > { > > pv_pit_handler(port, (uint8_t)data, 1); > > } > > - else if ( (port == RTC_PORT(0)) ) > > + else if ( port == RTC_PORT(0) ) > > { > > currd->arch.cmos_idx = data; > > } > > ... the code adjustments all being to other than macros I wonder > whether in the version you use the issue is no longer being > reported in macro expansions, but older clang still chokes on such. > Or did you go check that we have no such uses left (which seems > unlikely to me)? I assume that in recent versions of clang this is no longer an issue. Travis tests with clang 3.5 and I test with 3.8, and none of them find any issues. IMHO we should turn it on because I barely doubt anyone is building Xen with older versions of clang, when I started working on this the clang support was completely bitrotted. Roger. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |