[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Unable to boot Xen 4.8 with iommu=0
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Tamas K Lengyel <tamas.k.lengyel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 3:03 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> On 15.02.17 at 00:21, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 14/02/2017 22:47, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: >>>> (XEN) Switched to APIC driver x2apic_cluster. >>>> (XEN) XSM Framework v1.0.0 initialized >>>> (XEN) Flask: 128 avtab hash slots, 394 rules. >>>> (XEN) Flask: 128 avtab hash slots, 394 rules. >>>> (XEN) Flask: 5 users, 3 roles, 43 types, 2 bools >>>> (XEN) Flask: 12 classes, 394 rules >>>> (XEN) Flask: Starting in enforcing mode. >>>> (XEN) xstate: size: 0x340 and states: 0x7 >>>> (XEN) Intel machine check reporting enabled >>>> (XEN) Using scheduler: SMP Credit Scheduler (credit) >>>> (XEN) Platform timer is 14.318MHz HPET >>>> (XEN) Detected 3392.326 MHz processor. >>>> (XEN) Initing memory sharing. >>>> (XEN) alt table ffff82d0802d3f38 -> ffff82d0802d5564 >>>> (XEN) PCI: MCFG configuration 0: base e0000000 segment 0000 buses 00 - 3f >>>> (XEN) PCI: Not using MCFG for segment 0000 bus 00-3f >>>> (XEN) >>>> (XEN) **************************************** >>>> (XEN) Panic on CPU 0: >>>> (XEN) Couldn't enable IOMMU and iommu=required/force >>>> (XEN) **************************************** >>>> (XEN) >>>> (XEN) Reboot in five seconds... >>>> (XEN) Resetting with ACPI MEMORY or I/O RESET_REG. >>>> >>>> As seen in the command line iommu is not set to required or forced. >>>> Yet Xen thinks it is set to required/force. Has anyone else run into >>>> this issue? >>> >>> This area is a rats nest :( >>> >>> The problem is that the APIC setup has chosen to use the x2apic_cluster >>> driver, which in the Xen code depends on x2APIC, which depends on >>> interrupt remapping, which depends on an IOMMU. >>> >>> (I could have sworn we fixed this before), but the bug is that the APIC >>> setup shouldn't choose any of the x2apic modes if there isn't an >>> interrupt remapping capable IOMMU. >> >> And from going over the code I can't see how this would happen, >> so Tamas, it would be nice if you could add some verbosity to the >> functions involved. In particular x2apic_bsp_setup() must be >> getting success (zero) from iommu_enable_x2apic_IR(), yet that >> function calls iommu_supports_eim(), which ought to produce >> false through its very first exit path in your case. >> >> Or wait - do you have the same issue if you use >> "iommu=no,no-intremap"? In which case the problem would be >> that "iommu=no" should clear more than just "iommu_enable", or >> code checking iommu_intremap early (before iommu_setup() >> manages to clear it in the case here) would need to made look at >> both variables. Oddly enough acpi_parse_dmar() only bails if >> both variables are clear, which suggests to me that >> iommu_enable is intended to have two different meanings in >> different contexts (master flag vs. controlling just DMA >> remapping). Kevin, Feng - any thoughts here? > > iommu=no,no-intremap boots fine with "(XEN) Using APIC driver default" And just to clarify, x2apic is disabled in this case "(XEN) Not enabling x2APIC: depends on iommu_supports_eim." Tamas _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |