Re: [Xen-devel] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: claim responsability for xen

[Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@xxxxxxxxx>]

2016-11-11 04:49, Tan, Jianfeng:
> Hi Thomas and Konrad,
> 
> On 11/11/2016 2:59 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >> 2016-11-07 07:38, Jianfeng Tan:
> >>> As some users are still using xen as the hypervisor, I suggest to
> >>> continue support for xen in DPDK. And from 16.11, I will be the
> >>> maintainer of all xen-related files.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jianfeng Tan <jianfeng.tan@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Applied
> >>
> >> Please Jianfeng, could you start your new role by sending a status
> >> of Xen dom0 support in DPDK? I think there are some issues in latest 
> >> releases.
> 
> Yes, I'm on this. And hope to send out update in the next week.
> 
> > Pls also CC me and xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx if possible.
> 
> Glad to do that.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jianfeng

Any news about Xen dom0 status in DPDK?

I think there is not enough interest for Xen dom0 in the DPDK community.
Last time we talked about, it was because of a severe bug which is not
fixed yet:
        http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-July/044207.html
        http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-July/044376.html

The request (6 month ago) was to give more time for feedbacks:
        http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-July/044847.html

Is it time now to officially remove Dom0 support?

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel