[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Unable to boot Xen 4.8 with iommu=0
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@xxxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 5:32 PM > > >>> On 15.02.17 at 20:30, <tamas.k.lengyel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 3:03 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>>> On 15.02.17 at 00:21, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> On 14/02/2017 22:47, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > >>>> (XEN) Switched to APIC driver x2apic_cluster. > >>>> (XEN) XSM Framework v1.0.0 initialized > >>>> (XEN) Flask: 128 avtab hash slots, 394 rules. > >>>> (XEN) Flask: 128 avtab hash slots, 394 rules. > >>>> (XEN) Flask: 5 users, 3 roles, 43 types, 2 bools > >>>> (XEN) Flask: 12 classes, 394 rules > >>>> (XEN) Flask: Starting in enforcing mode. > >>>> (XEN) xstate: size: 0x340 and states: 0x7 > >>>> (XEN) Intel machine check reporting enabled > >>>> (XEN) Using scheduler: SMP Credit Scheduler (credit) > >>>> (XEN) Platform timer is 14.318MHz HPET > >>>> (XEN) Detected 3392.326 MHz processor. > >>>> (XEN) Initing memory sharing. > >>>> (XEN) alt table ffff82d0802d3f38 -> ffff82d0802d5564 > >>>> (XEN) PCI: MCFG configuration 0: base e0000000 segment 0000 buses 00 - 3f > >>>> (XEN) PCI: Not using MCFG for segment 0000 bus 00-3f > >>>> (XEN) > >>>> (XEN) **************************************** > >>>> (XEN) Panic on CPU 0: > >>>> (XEN) Couldn't enable IOMMU and iommu=required/force > >>>> (XEN) **************************************** > >>>> (XEN) > >>>> (XEN) Reboot in five seconds... > >>>> (XEN) Resetting with ACPI MEMORY or I/O RESET_REG. > >>>> > >>>> As seen in the command line iommu is not set to required or forced. > >>>> Yet Xen thinks it is set to required/force. Has anyone else run into > >>>> this issue? > >>> > >>> This area is a rats nest :( > >>> > >>> The problem is that the APIC setup has chosen to use the x2apic_cluster > >>> driver, which in the Xen code depends on x2APIC, which depends on > >>> interrupt remapping, which depends on an IOMMU. > >>> > >>> (I could have sworn we fixed this before), but the bug is that the APIC > >>> setup shouldn't choose any of the x2apic modes if there isn't an > >>> interrupt remapping capable IOMMU. > >> > >> And from going over the code I can't see how this would happen, > >> so Tamas, it would be nice if you could add some verbosity to the > >> functions involved. In particular x2apic_bsp_setup() must be > >> getting success (zero) from iommu_enable_x2apic_IR(), yet that > >> function calls iommu_supports_eim(), which ought to produce > >> false through its very first exit path in your case. > >> > >> Or wait - do you have the same issue if you use > >> "iommu=no,no-intremap"? In which case the problem would be > >> that "iommu=no" should clear more than just "iommu_enable", or > >> code checking iommu_intremap early (before iommu_setup() > >> manages to clear it in the case here) would need to made look at > >> both variables. Oddly enough acpi_parse_dmar() only bails if > >> both variables are clear, which suggests to me that > >> iommu_enable is intended to have two different meanings in > >> different contexts (master flag vs. controlling just DMA > >> remapping). Kevin, Feng - any thoughts here? > > > > iommu=no,no-intremap boots fine with "(XEN) Using APIC driver default" > > Thanks for confirming. > > Kevin, Feng, we now depend on your input regarding the intentions > with the two variables. > Feng just left Intel. Let me take a look at code to understand the rationale behind. Thanks Kevin _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |