[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 08/19] x86/mce: set mcinfo_comm.type and .size in x86_mcinfo_reserve()



On 02/20/17 02:02 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 20.02.17 at 03:48, <haozhong.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 02/17/17 03:07 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 17.02.17 at 07:39, <haozhong.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > @@ -804,7 +800,7 @@ static void mcinfo_clear(struct mc_info *mi)
> >> >      x86_mcinfo_nentries(mi) = 0;
> >> >  }
> >> >  
> >> > -void *x86_mcinfo_reserve(struct mc_info *mi, int size)
> >> > +void *x86_mcinfo_reserve(struct mc_info *mi, uint16_t size, uint16_t 
> >> > type)
> >> 
> >> There's no need for fixed width types here afaics. With them
> >> replaced by "unsigned int"
> >> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > The reason I use uint16_t is because the type of mcinfo_common.type
> > and .size is uint16_t.
> 
> I guessed that, but the parameters have no need to be fixed
> width just because they get stored into some fixed width field.
> Please remember that dealing with plain (unsigned) int is slightly
> more efficient than dealing with uint16_t (or uint64_t, btw).
> 
OK, I'll change to the unsigned type.

Thanks,
Haozhong

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.