[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 08/10] x86/cpuid: Handle leaf 0xb in guest_cpuid()
>>> On 20.02.17 at 12:00, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Leaf 0xb is reserved by AMD, and uniformly hidden from guests by the toolstack > logic and hypervisor PV logic. > > The previous dynamic logic filled in the x2APIC ID for all HVM guests. This > is modified to respect the entire leaf being reserved by AMD, but is altered > to include PV Intel guests, so they get more sensible values in their emulated > and faulted view of CPUID. Don't we expose x2APIC to HVM guests even on AMD systems? In which case we surely will want to also expose the x2APIC ID. > @@ -959,6 +950,14 @@ void guest_cpuid(const struct vcpu *v, uint32_t leaf, > } > break; > > + case 0xb: > + if ( p->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL ) > + { > + /* Fix the x2APIC identifier. */ > + res->d = v->vcpu_id * 2; > + } > + break; Irrespective of the comment above, wouldn't the if() here better look at the x2APIC feature flag of the domain? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |