|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 18/19] xen/mce: add support of vLMCE injection to XEN_MC_inject_v2
On 02/22/17 08:59 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 17.02.17 at 07:39, <haozhong.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> > @@ -1510,6 +1510,7 @@ long do_mca(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xen_mc_t) u_xen_mc)
> > {
> > const cpumask_t *cpumap;
> > cpumask_var_t cmv;
> > + int cpu_nr;
>
> unsigned int (and likely no need for the _nr suffix)
>
> Or perhaps the local variable isn't needed at all.
>
I'll inline this variable.
> > @@ -1552,6 +1553,21 @@ long do_mca(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xen_mc_t)
> > u_xen_mc)
> > send_IPI_mask(cpumap, cmci_apic_vector);
> > }
> > break;
> > + case XEN_MC_INJECT_TYPE_LMCE:
> > + if ( !lmce_support )
> > + {
> > + ret = x86_mcerr("No LMCE support in platform", -EINVAL);
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + /* ensure at most one CPU is specified */
>
> And what use is none at all? Also - comment style (should start with
> a capital).
>
Do you mean the check of empty cpumap? It's checked at the beginning of case
XEN_MC_inject_v2.
> > + cpu_nr = cpumask_next(cpumask_first(cpumap), cpumap);
> > + if ( cpu_nr < nr_cpu_ids )
> > + {
> > + ret = x86_mcerr("More than one CPU specified", -EINVAL);
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + on_selected_cpus(cpumap, x86_mc_mceinject, NULL, 1);
> > + break;
> > default:
>
> See earlier patch comments regarding blank lines missing here.
>
I'll add a blank line before the default case.
Thanks,
Haozhong
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |