[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/MCE: sanitize domain/vcpu ID handling



On 23/02/17 12:21, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 23.02.17 at 13:02, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 23/02/17 09:28, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/mcaction.c
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/mcaction.c
>>> @@ -100,7 +100,8 @@ mc_memerr_dhandler(struct mca_binfo *bin
>>>                      goto vmce_failed;
>>>                  }
>>>  
>>> -                if ( boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL )
>>> +                if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL ||
>>> +                    global->mc_vcpuid == XEN_MC_VCPUID_INVALID)
>> Isn't this a backwards step, style-wise?  This file, using 4 spaces, is
>> Xen style rather than Linux style.
> The majority of the file is using Linux style _except_ for
> indentation. There are, oddly enough, a few exceptions in the
> big if() statement towards the end of the file (where this
> change also applies to).

We desperately need to reduce the style inconsistencies, because it is a
major problem for contributors.

IMO, that means we altering files like this to match Xen style.

~Andrew

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.