[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 07/24] x86: refactor psr: implement get value flow.
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 04:49:22PM +0800, Yi Sun wrote: > This patch implements get value flow including L3 CAT callback > function. > > It also changes domctl interface to make it more general. > > With this patch, 'psr-cat-show' can work for L3 CAT but not for > L3 code/data which is implemented in patch "x86: refactor psr: > implement get value flow for CDP.". > > Signed-off-by: Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > xen/arch/x86/domctl.c | 18 +++++++++--------- > xen/arch/x86/psr.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > xen/include/asm-x86/psr.h | 4 ++-- > 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) [...] > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/psr.c b/xen/arch/x86/psr.c > index 8af59d9..c1afd36 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/x86/psr.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/psr.c > @@ -116,6 +116,9 @@ struct feat_ops { > /* get_feat_info is used to get feature HW info. */ > bool (*get_feat_info)(const struct feat_node *feat, > uint32_t data[], unsigned int array_len); > + /* get_val is used to get feature COS register value. */ > + bool (*get_val)(const struct feat_node *feat, unsigned int cos, > + enum cbm_type type, uint64_t *val); > }; > > /* > @@ -260,9 +263,22 @@ static bool l3_cat_get_feat_info(const struct feat_node > *feat, > return true; > } > > +static bool l3_cat_get_val(const struct feat_node *feat, unsigned int cos, > + enum cbm_type type, uint64_t *val) > +{ > + if ( cos > feat->info.l3_cat_info.cos_max ) > + /* Use default value. */ > + cos = 0; I don't know much, but shouldn't this return false instead of silently defaulting to 0? This doesn't seem to be what the caller expects. > + > + *val = feat->cos_reg_val[cos]; > + > + return true; > +} > + > static const struct feat_ops l3_cat_ops = { > .get_cos_max = l3_cat_get_cos_max, > .get_feat_info = l3_cat_get_feat_info, > + .get_val = l3_cat_get_val, > }; > > static void __init parse_psr_bool(char *s, char *value, char *feature, > @@ -482,12 +498,14 @@ static struct psr_socket_info *get_socket_info(unsigned > int socket) > return socket_info + socket; > } > > -int psr_get_info(unsigned int socket, enum cbm_type type, > - uint32_t data[], unsigned int array_len) > +static int psr_get(unsigned int socket, enum cbm_type type, > + uint32_t data[], unsigned int array_len, > + struct domain *d, uint64_t *val) > { > const struct psr_socket_info *info = get_socket_info(socket); > const struct feat_node *feat; > enum psr_feat_type feat_type; > + unsigned int cos; > > if ( IS_ERR(info) ) > return PTR_ERR(info); > @@ -498,6 +516,15 @@ int psr_get_info(unsigned int socket, enum cbm_type type, > if ( feat->feature != feat_type ) > continue; > > + if ( d ) > + { > + cos = d->arch.psr_cos_ids[socket]; > + if ( feat->ops.get_val(feat, cos, type, val) ) > + return 0; > + else No need for the "else" branch here. Roger. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |