[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 12/17] x86emul: support SSE4.1 insns
On 28/02/17 12:56, Jan Beulich wrote: > @@ -6951,6 +7040,97 @@ x86_emulate( > fic.insn_bytes = PFX_BYTES + 3; > break; > > + case X86EMUL_OPC_66(0x0f38, 0x20): /* pmovsxbw xmm/m64,xmm */ > + case X86EMUL_OPC_66(0x0f38, 0x21): /* pmovsxbd xmm/m32,xmm */ > + case X86EMUL_OPC_66(0x0f38, 0x22): /* pmovsxbq xmm/m16,xmm */ > + case X86EMUL_OPC_66(0x0f38, 0x23): /* pmovsxwd xmm/m64,xmm */ > + case X86EMUL_OPC_66(0x0f38, 0x24): /* pmovsxwq xmm/m32,xmm */ > + case X86EMUL_OPC_66(0x0f38, 0x25): /* pmovsxdq xmm/m64,xmm */ > + case X86EMUL_OPC_66(0x0f38, 0x30): /* pmovzxbw xmm/m64,xmm */ > + case X86EMUL_OPC_66(0x0f38, 0x31): /* pmovzxbd xmm/m32,xmm */ > + case X86EMUL_OPC_66(0x0f38, 0x32): /* pmovzxbq xmm/m16,xmm */ > + case X86EMUL_OPC_66(0x0f38, 0x33): /* pmovzxwd xmm/m64,xmm */ > + case X86EMUL_OPC_66(0x0f38, 0x34): /* pmovzxwq xmm/m32,xmm */ > + case X86EMUL_OPC_66(0x0f38, 0x35): /* pmovzxdq xmm/m64,xmm */ > + op_bytes = 16 >> pmov_convert_delta[b & 7]; > + /* fall through */ > + case X86EMUL_OPC_66(0x0f38, 0x10): /* pblendvb XMM0,xmm/m128,xmm */ > + case X86EMUL_OPC_66(0x0f38, 0x14): /* blendvps XMM0,xmm/m128,xmm */ > + case X86EMUL_OPC_66(0x0f38, 0x15): /* blendvpd XMM0,xmm/m128,xmm */ > + case X86EMUL_OPC_66(0x0f38, 0x28): /* pmuldq xmm/m128,xmm */ > + case X86EMUL_OPC_66(0x0f38, 0x29): /* pcmpeqq xmm/m128,xmm */ > + case X86EMUL_OPC_66(0x0f38, 0x2b): /* packusdw xmm/m128,xmm */ > + case X86EMUL_OPC_66(0x0f38, 0x38): /* pminsb xmm/m128,xmm */ > + case X86EMUL_OPC_66(0x0f38, 0x39): /* pminsd xmm/m128,xmm */ > + case X86EMUL_OPC_66(0x0f38, 0x3a): /* pminub xmm/m128,xmm */ > + case X86EMUL_OPC_66(0x0f38, 0x3b): /* pminud xmm/m128,xmm */ > + case X86EMUL_OPC_66(0x0f38, 0x3c): /* pmaxsb xmm/m128,xmm */ > + case X86EMUL_OPC_66(0x0f38, 0x3d): /* pmaxsd xmm/m128,xmm */ > + case X86EMUL_OPC_66(0x0f38, 0x3e): /* pmaxub xmm/m128,xmm */ > + case X86EMUL_OPC_66(0x0f38, 0x3f): /* pmaxud xmm/m128,xmm */ > + case X86EMUL_OPC_66(0x0f38, 0x40): /* pmulld xmm/m128,xmm */ > + case X86EMUL_OPC_66(0x0f38, 0x41): /* phminposuw xmm/m128,xmm */ > + host_and_vcpu_must_have(sse4_1); > + goto simd_0f38_common; > + > + case X86EMUL_OPC_66(0x0f38, 0x17): /* ptest xmm/m128,xmm */ > + case X86EMUL_OPC_VEX_66(0x0f38, 0x17): /* vptest {x,y}mm/mem,{x,y}mm */ > + if ( vex.opcx == vex_none ) > + { > + host_and_vcpu_must_have(sse4_1); > + get_fpu(X86EMUL_FPU_xmm, &fic); > + } > + else > + { > + generate_exception_if(vex.reg != 0xf, EXC_UD); > + host_and_vcpu_must_have(avx); > + get_fpu(X86EMUL_FPU_ymm, &fic); > + } > + > + opc = init_prefixes(stub); > + if ( vex.opcx == vex_none ) > + opc[0] = 0x38; > + opc[vex.opcx == vex_none] = b; > + opc[1 + (vex.opcx == vex_none)] = modrm; This use of (vex.opcx == vex_none) for construction is very awkward to read. How about: if ( vex.opcx == vex_none ) { opc[0] = 0x38; opc++; /* Adjust for extra prefix. */ } ... if ( vex.opcx == vex_none ) opc--; /* Undo adjustment for extra prefix. */ which allows the rest of the opc[] setup to read like all the other similar code. In fact, thinking more about this, using a pointer-arithmatic-based method of filling the stub would allow for the removal of "fic.insn_bytes = PFX_BYTES + $X", and any chance of getting the count wrong. ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |